<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Seitz. Writes. &#187; It&#8217;s always Peter who drops the ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seitzwrites.com/tag/its-always-peter-who-drops-the-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seitzwrites.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I hate peter travers&#8217; review of I love you, man&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.seitzwrites.com/2009/03/26/i-hate-peter-travers-review-of-i-love-you-man/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=i-hate-peter-travers-review-of-i-love-you-man</link>
		<comments>http://www.seitzwrites.com/2009/03/26/i-hate-peter-travers-review-of-i-love-you-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool is always just out of Peter's Reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Hate Peter Travers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I love you man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[It's always Peter who drops the ball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seitzwrites.com/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So my plan last week was to fire up the way-back machine and do my thing with Peter Travers&#8217; zero-star review of Bad Boys II, arguably the second greatest Henry Rollins movie of all time. I ran into a slight hitch when I realized that, for a movie he considers to be in the category [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-392" title="1da79_i-love-you-man-poster" src="http://www.seitzwrites.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/1da79_i-love-you-man-poster.jpg" alt="1da79_i-love-you-man-poster" width="443" height="600" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">So my plan last week was to fire up the way-back machine and do my thing with Peter Travers&#8217; zero-star review of <em>Bad Boys II</em>, arguably the second greatest Henry Rollins movie of all time. I ran into a slight hitch when I realized that, for a movie he considers to be in the category of all time worst movies, Peter really didn&#8217;t have that much to say about it. Not that I have anything against recycling jokes, <a href="http://www.seitzwrites.com/2009/03/07/i-hate-peter-travers-review-of-watchmen/">as my running commentary on the awkward sexual tension of his <em>Watchmen</em> review should indicate</a>, but there wasn&#8217;t much for me to talk about except  the irony of the most bombastic film-reviewer of all time hating a movie for being too bombastic.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">So this week I&#8217;m delving into <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/23654719/review/26794160/i_love_you_man">his review of <em>I Love You, Man</em></a>, the Rudd and Segal buddy movie that came out last week. Nobody&#8217;s ever accused me of punctuality.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">You know the drills. Words after the jump:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-391"></span><strong><span class="content">Here&#8217;s the thing about comedies: Even when the script is freighted with formula, the right actors can keep it afloat, even airborne.</span></strong></p>
<p>Apparently even writers for major entertainment publications are allowed to mix metaphors now. I&#8217;d probably be less bitter if I had a similarly cushy job, but I don&#8217;t, so I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p><strong><span class="content">In a down market for giggles (<em>Miss March</em>? Please!), Paul Rudd and Jason Segel are howlingly funny.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Quick, somebody get Geithner on the line. Giggles need a bailout!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">They have skills.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">True story. Peter Travers once saw the two of them build a campfire out of all the excess money they made by doing the exact same movie every six months.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">They can get laughs without the sitcom pimping.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Is there a pimp sitcom out there I don&#8217;t know about? If not, Fox needs to get on that right away. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">By the way, Jason Segel stars in the sitcom &#8220;How I Met Your Mother.&#8221; Just saying.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">It&#8217;s a rare gift, staying hilarious and recognizably human.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Yes, rare is the gift that allows these two humans to continue to be recognized as humans while being hilarious. Personally, I&#8217;m hilarious, but I tend to look more like a North American Grizzly when I do it.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">Their presence and ace comic timing kick the movie up a notch.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">You know what? I totally missed that fact that Peter Travers decided to open with a lightning round. In a five-line dual-knob slob-off, Peter travers has managed to say absolutely nothing of value, which I guess is a win for him.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">Director John Hamburg (<em>Along Came Polly</em>), who teamed on the script with <em>Seinfeld</em> writer Larry Levin, hangs the plot on a flimsy premise: A dude with no dude friends needs a dude to be best man at his wedding.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Look, I use dude to open pretty much every third sentence I say. I&#8217;m tired of my lifestyle being mercilessly persecuted by these out of touch wind bags who don&#8217;t understand my cultural upbringing, man.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">Never mind that the needy dude, tightly wound L.A. realtor Peter Klaven (Rudd), has a brother, Robbie (Andy Samberg), who could easily do the job.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">This is what passes for analysis in a Peter Travers movie. Christ, he&#8217;s the kind of guy who watches Law &amp; Order and feels smart for guessing that the wife did it, isn&#8217;t he?</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">That would leave no reason to get Peter out on man dates.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Two things: First, whoever it was that came up with the term &#8220;man date&#8221; and chuckled about the fact that it sounds like another word, despite the lack of any kind of related double entendre, should be deported to Slovakia. Second, does he seem a little too insistant that Peter go on these man dates, or am I really just reading way too much into this?</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">That&#8217;s right, Peter&#8217;s fiancée, Zooey (a sparky Rashida Jones) — whose girl network is so in the loop they know precisely the first time Peter went oral on Zooey (&#8220;Lock that tongue down, girl&#8221;) — encourages the poor schnook to go out and find a best buddy.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=schnook&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi">A Google Image search for Schnook</a>, which apparently means a stupid or gullible person, similar to a &#8220;dolt.&#8221; It takes mere seconds to google a word to find out if it sucks, by the way.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content"><strong>After several disastrous tries, including a gay close encounter, the search ends with Sydney Fife (Segel). Sydney is Peter&#8217;s polar opposite, a likable slob who holes up in a Venice Beach man cave stuffed with porn and video games</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Let&#8217;s see: gay close encounter&#8230;pole&#8230;slob&#8230;holes&#8230;man cave&#8230;stuffed&#8230;porn. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">Sydney has a comfort level inside his own skin that Peter never dreamed possible. </span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Jesus Christ. Peter Travers is actually writing<em> I Love You, Man</em> slash fiction.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">Without ever infringing on <em>Brokeback</em> territory, Sydney is man enough to make Zooey jealous. </span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Just a little late there, buddy. I think you&#8217;ve already &#8220;infringed&#8221; all over Brokeback&#8217;s &#8220;territory.&#8221;<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">And that&#8217;s it. That&#8217;s all. It&#8217;s the variations that Rudd and Segel spin on this theme that make the movie hugely enjoyable.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Right, because that line couldn&#8217;t be used whenever these guys do the exact same thing <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/21376768/review/24014399/role_models">every</a> <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/15481395/review/20301044/forgetting_sarah_marshall">six</a> <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/10302458/review/14934205/knocked_up">months</a>.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">There&#8217;s no one better than Rudd at putting an affable face on awkwardness.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Woody Allen is so pissed off right now.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">it&#8217;s always Peter who drops the ball.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Yes, it is always Peter who drops the ball. It&#8217;s nice when he writes my side for me.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">Cool is always just out of Peter&#8217;s reach </span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">I&#8217;m just going to pop out and grab a coffee. Anyone else want one?</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">It&#8217;s a passion for Rush (the band puts in a surprise appearance) that bonds Peter and Sydney.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Surprise? Well, not any more. Way to drop the ball Peter.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">Segel has a ball playing the other side of the inhibited musician he wrote for himself in the underrated <em>Forgetting Sarah Marshall</em>.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Well, <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/forgetting_sarah_marshall/">Rotten Tomatoes</a>, <a href="http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/forgettingsarahmarshall?q=forgetting%20sarah%20marshall">Metacritic</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0800039/">imbd</a> all have<em> Forgetting Sarah Marshall </em>rated<em> </em>pretty highly. I guess that&#8217;s good for a movie that sucked, but remind me again what &#8220;underrated&#8221; means?</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">He also lets you in on the loneliness that&#8217;s eating at this free spirit.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Yet another sneak peek at Peter&#8217;s upcoming romance novel, <em>Travers of the Night</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">Jaime Pressly is terrific as Zooey&#8217;s BFF. Her battles with Jon Favreau, excellent as her blowhard husband, have genuine comic bite.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Honestly, I don&#8217;t know what &#8220;genuine comic bite&#8221; means, so I&#8217;m just going to let it be.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">The movie goes soft in its final stages </span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">Lest anyone think I&#8217;m out to paint Peter Travers as some kind of sexual deviant, bear in mind that he actually wrote that.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span class="content">&#8220;Sweet, sweet hangin&#8217;,&#8221; says Peter of knowing Sydney. The same goes for the movie.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="content">That&#8217;s it? Honestly, if Rolling Stone gave me any money at all, I&#8217;d be willing to invest the minute and a half it would take to come up with a better ending line than that.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>Quick programming note: At some point in the next month or so, I&#8217;m hoping to spin this feature off into its own website at www.ihatepetertravers.com (it currently redirects to a listing of posts tagged &#8220;I Hate Peter Travers&#8221;).  I&#8217;m looking for writers who can do posts in this same vein (hopefully directed at a wider range of bad critics) as well as people who are interested in doing actual movie reviews. </em><em>If there&#8217;s anyone out there with an interest in getting in on the groundfloor of this non-lucrative enterprise, drop me an email at <a href="mailto: jon@seitzwrites.com">jon@seitzwrites.com</a>.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seitzwrites.com/2009/03/26/i-hate-peter-travers-review-of-i-love-you-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

